Competitor tracking: a census of 124 listings

Competitors are named up front and carried through the deliverables, with citation share measured against them and monthly share-of-voice reporting afterwards.

Checked 2026-09-10

Competitor benchmarking sits inside the same audit view and every plan includes share-of-voice measurement against rivals.

Checked 2026-09-10

Rival brands sit in the same charts as yours, but the trial comparison is capped at five other brands and the marketing FAQ repeats the same five-competitor limit.

Checked 2026-09-12

Rivals are captured automatically from the same prompt runs rather than configured separately, and win rate against them is a headline metric.

Checked 2026-09-10

Share of voice against competitors is on both tiers, but Solo caps you at three rivals and withholds the brand-by-platform heatmap and citation gap view.

Checked 2026-10-14

Competitor mention tracking is included from the entry plan, and losing a moment shows which rival brand replaced you; diff dashboards are a Pro addition.

Checked 2026-09-08

Rival brands sit in the same view: the setup step proposes competitors automatically and the overview compares share of voice, mentions, citations and impressions side by side.

Checked 2026-09-19

Competitors can be added manually or from auto-discovery and are compared on visibility, share of voice and position across models.

Checked 2026-10-04

Rival brands sit in the same view as your own, compared on visibility, position and citations; no tier gating is shown for it.

Checked 2026-09-17

Unlimited competitors per brand on every tier, with share-of-voice by topic cluster and automatic gap analysis on each scan.

Checked 2026-09-19

Competitors are first-class: you add rival brands beside your own and the dashboard reports share of voice per buyer query and per topic.

Checked 2026-09-16

Competitors are named in every tier, but structured benchmarking against a fixed set only starts at Pro: three rivals on Pro, five on Complete, while Scan reports whoever surfaced.

Checked 2026-10-15

Competitors are auto-selected by mention volume, can be added or removed by hand, and appear in a shared topic matrix with head-to-head comparisons.

Checked 2026-10-15

Rivals sit in the same prompt view with share, position and citation comparison, and competitor tracking is uncapped on every plan including the entry tier.

Checked 2026-09-12

Competitor benchmarking is a named capability and share of model is scored relative to rivals in the same view.

Checked 2026-10-15

Competitors are discovered rather than declared: every domain and brand mentioned is stored, so you benchmark against whoever actually appears for your prompts instead of a preset rival list.

Checked 2026-09-13

Rival brands sit in the same dashboards as your own, with no cap on how many you track, plus a topic-by-competitor heatmap.

Checked 2026-09-20

You can audit a rival's page structure with doctor, but the measurement command takes exactly one required domain per run, so there is no side-by-side rival citation view.

Checked 2026-09-12

Rival brands appear in the same view, ranked by mentions with visibility share and sentiment, and can be expanded prompt by prompt.

Checked 2026-10-04

Competitors are tracked in the same answer-monitoring work as the client brand, and a dedicated displacement workflow analyses why rivals are cited in order to replace them.

Checked 2026-09-20

Competitor domains are added per project, scanned, compared on visibility share and coverage, and tracked across the same saved prompts as your own brand.

Checked 2026-09-21

Rival brands sit in the same visibility tables by engine, with the vendor framing competitive position as a headline use case.

Checked 2026-09-09

Competitors sit in the same view across AI answers and classic search, weighted by search demand and broken down to URL level.

Checked 2026-09-11

Rivals are in the same view by design: every plan tier shows competitor tracking, each lost prompt is attributed to the competitor that owns the answer, and the free scanner is explicitly meant to be run on rival brands.

Checked 2026-09-08

Competitors found in a tracked brand's own AI answers are reported beside it, including share of answers, and the client portal view exposes the same comparison.

Checked 2026-10-03

Rival brands sit in the same view by design: public category pages rank vendors by visibility share, and the paid segments screen reports vendor rankings per engine.

Checked 2026-09-11

Competitors are detected automatically as entities from the LLM answers and charted beside your brand, with the top five entities pre-selected by default on each new dashboard.

Checked 2026-09-11

Rivals are configured per project and folded into every subsequent ranking check, with a documented ceiling of ten competitors per project on the Pro plan.

Checked 2026-09-13

Competitors are added in setup and measured on the same prompts, producing a share-of-voice ranking in the same dashboard view.

Checked 2026-09-21

Share of voice against rivals is a headline feature and the shared limits table puts no ceiling on tracked competitors.

Checked 2026-09-24

Rival domains are ranked in the same result view and each one can be opened to see its per-prompt citation rates and the pages it was cited for.

Checked 2026-10-08

Competitors are unlimited on every tier and benchmarked on visibility, sentiment, position and citation authority.

Checked 2026-09-21

Rival brands sit in the same market share view, with a hard tracked-competitor ceiling of 5 on Essentials and 25 on Growth before Enterprise custom limits.

Checked 2026-10-06

Rival brands sit in the same project and view, but the number you may select is capped per plan: five on Starter, ten on Growth, twenty on Scale, negotiated on Custom.

Checked 2026-09-15

Competitors are benchmarked in both the free report and ongoing work, covering mention share, which queries are won or lost, and the content most likely to displace the brand.

Checked 2026-09-23

Competitors are a first-class view in the AI-visibility data and competitor domains are a writable project setting used for content planning.

Checked 2026-09-25

Rivals are tracked in the same workspace with a per-plan ceiling: three on Starter, five on Growth, ten on Pro and Concierge, twenty on Agency.

Checked 2026-09-13

Named competitors are tracked in the same prompts and views as your own brand, with share of voice, a leaderboard and per-prompt trend lines, and it is included in the free self-hosted build.

Checked 2026-09-11

Competitors appear in the same brand comparison view with mentions, rank, sentiment, share of response and co-occurrence; Lite caps this at ten rivals.

Checked 2026-09-26

Rival names are tracked as keywords in the same scoreboard, and a separate Competitor Scan reads the places that cite three to five rivals.

Checked 2026-09-23

Rivals are discovered and ranked for you rather than typed in, and the same view shows where each competitor sits per model.

Checked 2026-09-12

Rivals sit in the same view with share of voice, head-to-head per model and their cited sources; the plan table ticks it on every tier.

Checked 2026-09-08

Measurement records which rival products each platform named and in what order, which is how the firm claims a client became the most-recommended vendor in its category.

Checked 2026-10-13

Competitor domains are tracked in the same prompt set with share of voice and their cited URLs, so you can see why a rival wins.

Checked 2026-09-03

Confirmed competitors are compared in the same views through Share of Voice and historical snapshots, within pooled per-plan competitor limits.

Checked 2026-09-26

You pick the rival brands yourself and see share of voice against them in the answers to your own tracked prompts, alongside an industry-median benchmark.

Checked 2026-10-03

Competitors are captured on the same prompt runs and compared side by side, with unlimited competitors on both plans.

Checked 2026-10-05

Competitor mentions sit in the same visibility view, with a counted ceiling per plan of one, five, ten or unlimited rivals.

Checked 2026-09-24

Named rivals are tracked in the same stored answers, capped at three competitors on Starter and ten on Pro, Managed and each Agency client product.

Checked 2026-09-14

Rivals sit in the same view as your own brand, capped at five competitors on Launch and ten on Grow.

Checked 2026-09-14

Rival brands are tracked in the same project view, with share of voice, ranking and per-brand visibility trends available on every tier.

Checked 2026-09-24

Competitors named in an answer are stored with every measurement and the paid audit adds a citation benchmark, yet the free check offers only industry-level context, not a rival watchlist.

Checked 2026-09-14

Rival brands are benchmarked on the same prompts in the same view, with mention counts and sentiment; unlimited competitors are an Enterprise line item.

Checked 2026-09-25

The answer-market check records rival providers named in the same answers and compares their mentions, sources and answer context against the client's.

Checked 2026-10-03

Competitor benchmarking sits inside Barracuda's core capabilities, and the free AI audit is pitched on exposing which competitor content signals are winning AI rankings.

Checked 2026-09-14

Competitor and industry benchmarking is checked on all three brand plans and on both agency plans, with historical trend comparison.

Checked 2026-09-15

The weekly audit records who is cited on each query and reports a share-of-voice trend, so rival brands surface, but no page describes naming a competitor set and tracking it as its own view.

Checked 2026-09-27

Competitors are configured at setup and rendered as share of voice, competitor visibility over time, and competitor citation comparisons in the same views.

Checked 2026-09-02

Competitors can be added and benchmarked in the same view, with visibility percentages per rival and new entrants flagged automatically.

Checked 2026-10-07

Benchmarking against competitors on the same AI-search metrics is named as part of the measurement work and is tracked over time, with competitive analysis also listed in the Growth stage scope.

Checked 2026-09-26

Competitor discovery and benchmarking sits in the same AI view, comparing visibility metrics and citation patterns against rival brands on the AI Visibility and 360 plans.

Checked 2026-10-09

Competitor visibility gaps are a row on every plan including Starter, with head-to-head views of questions rivals own and the brand does not.

Checked 2026-10-10

Competitors are first-class objects you edit yourself, and share of answer is reported against them per prompt and topic.

Checked 2026-09-03

Competitors you add are reported in the same view with appearance rate and share of voice, and Business Analysis ranks which brands AI lists most for your queries.

Checked 2026-09-03

Named competitors can be benchmarked on every metric in the same views, with share of voice showing the top four rivals plus 'Others'.

Checked 2026-09-27

You define a competitor set and brands are ranked against each other by share of voice and position, aggregated across every prompt for a keyword.

Checked 2026-10-11

A dedicated Brands tab shows competitor analysis, and the Opportunities table counts how many rival brands were mentioned on prompts where you were not.

Checked 2026-09-26

Competitor mentions sit in the same view across every tracked platform, and a dedicated Competitor Report compares rivals point by point on the same grid; included from the entry plan.

Checked 2026-10-11

A benchmark compares rival actors axis by axis in the same report, including players the client did not already track.

Checked 2026-10-03

A Benchmarking tab puts rival brands beside yours per model, and share of voice comparison is described as the product's headline metric.

Checked 2026-09-18

Rival brands appearing in the same answers are recorded automatically across all engines, with share-of-voice percentages per prompt, and the row is ticked on the entry plan.

Checked 2026-09-09

Share of Voice is reported, but no named-rival view is described anywhere.

Rival brands are tracked head-to-head in the same matrix, but every paid plan caps the set at five competitors and the free plan at one.

Checked 2026-10-14

Competitors can be added to the same prompt set and AI Overviews view, with colour-highlighted results, and the GEO Score compares brands side by side.

Checked 2026-09-27

Rival brands appear beside yours in every AI scan and in rank tracking, capped per site at 5 on Starter rising to 15 on Agency.

Checked 2026-09-28

Share of Voice vs Competitors and Competitor Citation Benchmarking are both ticked on Growth, Pro and Enterprise in the plan comparison table.

Checked 2026-09-28

Competitor positions are tracked alongside the client's in AI answers, and engagements include competitor and citation analysis as a named deliverable.

Checked 2026-09-28

Rival brands and domains sit in the same view as yours with share-of-voice and per-query comparison, but the allowance is capped at five competitors on every published plan, including Professional.

Checked 2026-09-03

Share of voice is benchmarked prompt by prompt against competitors the client names, across engines, and refreshed on a recurring basis.

Checked 2026-09-28

Classic competitor research is strong via domain overview and backlink comparison, but on the AI side the vendor describes highlighting one brand per prompt rather than a rival view.

Checked 2026-09-09

Competitor visibility is captured in the same benchmark run and reported as a share-of-voice comparison per model, and it appears even in the free report.

Checked 2026-09-03

Rival brands sit in the same view as yours, compared engine by engine and prompt by prompt, with the competitor set defined in Brand Brain.

Checked 2026-09-29

Competitors sit in the same Brand Report as your own brand, benchmarked on mentions, coverage and domain citations.

Checked 2026-09-29

Competitors are tracked alongside the brand per question, can be added or removed through the MCP write tools, and losing questions are filterable.

Checked 2026-10-07

Rivals sit in the same view and are auto-detected from your own answers, then compared on visibility, share of voice, sentiment and position across models, topics and countries.

Checked 2026-09-03

Competitive gap analysis happens during the topic and entity mapping step, but no ongoing rival-brand tracking view is described and the deliverables table names no competitor report.

Checked 2026-09-29

Rival brands sit in the same workspace but under a hard per-plan cap: three on Audit, five on Advisor, unlimited only on Agency.

Checked 2026-09-29

Rival brands sit in the same view for share-of-voice comparison, and the daily prompt runs cover competitors as well as you.

Checked 2026-09-09

Competitor benchmarking is in every project on every tier, extracting rival brands from the same answers and ranking them by share of voice and position.

Checked 2026-09-03

Competitors are set once per project and compared in a brand-by-model heatmap, so rival visibility sits in the same view as your own on every tracked engine.

Checked 2026-09-30

Competitors are detected automatically in collected answers and compared on position and gaps in the same views; the table includes it on every paid tier.

Checked 2026-10-10

Competitor monitoring is marked Yes on all four plans, covering mentions and share of voice on the same prompts you track.

Checked 2026-09-30

Surfaces competitors on your keywords and compares their score and platform coverage against yours.

Rival brands appear in the same share-of-answers view and can be tracked individually through the MCP tools, but the whole competitor view is withheld from the Free plan.

Checked 2026-10-13

Rivals are auto-detected from monitoring data and benchmarked head-to-head per engine, with share of voice and win/loss shown by system rather than only as an average.

Checked 2026-10-11

Competitor comparison is a named feature and an API action: a ranking report returns an id you pass back to retrieve the rival brands surfacing for the same entity.

Checked 2026-10-11

Competitors are detected automatically and compared per engine and per prompt, including which sources cite them and not you.

Checked 2026-10-12

Competitor benchmarking is ticked on all four plans, auto-discovers rivals and compares visibility, citations and sentiment side by side.

Checked 2026-09-30

Named competitors are benchmarked on every tracked prompt for visibility, share of voice and sentiment, and you can filter to sources that cite them but not you.

Checked 2026-09-30

Each recorded answer captures which competitors the engine named alongside or instead of you, and competitor tracking is listed as an included deliverable of the sprint.

Checked 2026-09-26

Competitors are added per brand and run through the same visibility, sentiment and source metrics in one industry ranking.

Checked 2026-10-13

Competitive presence and citation share alongside your brand; Core caps tracked competitors at five.

Checked 2026-09-02

Share-of-voice benchmarking against named rivals is included on all plans and competitors are added in the knowledge base.

Checked 2026-10-13

Competitor Research is a first-class report on the entry plan, and Brand Performance benchmarks perception against rivals; the plan card includes AI competitor analysis outright.

Checked 2026-09-18

Rival brands are counted from the engines' own answers rather than a typed list, producing a share-of-voice ratio and a competitor ranking over time.

Checked 2026-10-03

Competitor AI visibility and competitor rankings begin on Starter at $99 a month; the Free and Lite tiers show dashes in both rows, and Rank Tracker caps tracking at ten rivals per domain.

Checked 2026-09-15

Rivals are auto-discovered from the SERP and then tracked in both views: a keyword-gap matrix and a leaderboard of who AI names when you are missed.

Checked 2026-10-08

Rival brands are tracked in the same view and scored on the same prompts, with aliases supported, so share of voice reads as a position rather than a single-brand number.

Checked 2026-09-17

BlueprintIQ identifies overlapping content competitors and the topics they rank for that the client lacks.

Checked 2026-09-02

Shows the top 30 brands per tracked topic with share-of-voice, sentiment and citation comparisons.

Checked 2026-10-08

Up to ten competitor names can be supplied on a run and are detected in the responses and summaries alongside the target brand.

Checked 2026-10-09

Share of voice and Mention Gap benchmark rivals in the same view, but the Mention Gap feature is withheld from Discovery and Standard.

Checked 2026-10-09

Confirmed competitors are scored on the same organic prompt set, with mention counts and listed-first rates on one leaderboard.

Checked 2026-10-10

Rivals are compared prompt by prompt with win-loss records and movement alerts, and the feature is ticked for both Growth and Scale in the plan comparison.

Checked 2026-09-16

Rivals are added per project by brand name or domain and share of voice is computed for each, per engine and per prompt, though the count is capped by plan at three on Starter.

Checked 2026-09-17

Each prompt shows the rival brands AI mentions; tracked competitors are capped at 5 on Individual, 10 on Business and 15 on Enterprise.

Checked 2026-09-02

Audits surface whichever rivals the engines name, but choosing the exact competitor domains to watch starts at the Pro plan.

Checked 2026-09-18

Competitor citations are mapped to the same prompts and sources, with ranking shifts over time.

Checked 2026-09-02

Rival brands are discovered automatically from the answers and compared on the same prompts, with share of voice tracked over time.

Checked 2026-09-18

A head-to-head against the strongest rival and a leaderboard of answer slots held by rivals and community sites sit on the Overview, measured on your own questions.

Checked 2026-10-12

Competitors sit in the same views: citation leaderboard, share-of-voice and a per-topic and per-platform matrix.

Checked 2026-09-02

Competitors are discovered from the answers themselves rather than entered by hand, ranked by mention share, and never billed or capped.

Checked 2026-10-14