EdenRank

A stricter citation-vs-mention distinction backed by a public proof page — but read-only API access sits behind the $299/mo Concierge tier, and no independent reviews were found.

Best forTeams that want a stricter, source-verifiable definition of AI citation than a self-reported visibility score, and are willing to pay into the Concierge or Agency tier for API access and the automated execution workflow.

Visit EdenRank Compare

Our verdict

EdenRank's stricter citation-versus-mention distinction and its public, reproducible /proof page are genuine differentiators in a category where most vendors' visibility scores can't be independently checked — but API access sits further behind price than most rivals in this index, and there is no independent review record yet to weigh against the vendor's own claims.

Every pricing figure here was verified directly on edenrank.com/pricing. Company-background facts (operating entity, absence of a named founder) trace to EdenRank's own editorial-policy and legal pages, not a third-party source, which is disclosed here rather than presented as independently corroborated. No G2 or Capterra review data could be confirmed despite a live G2 product page existing.

The CitedIndex digest

New tools, fresh verdicts, and who's earning the top spots. One short email.

Screenshot of EdenRank
EdenRank, captured at verification, . Click to enlarge.

What's great

  • Draws an explicit, stricter distinction between a "mention" and a "citation," backed by a public, reproducible /proof page showing real prompt-level evidence rather than a self-reported score.
  • The buying-intent lens (Growth tier and up) names a specific reason — pricing, features, reviews, integrations, or a missing page — when a named competitor wins a high-intent prompt instead of the brand, rather than a generic visibility score.
  • The Concierge-tier autonomous agent discloses real safety limits — three risk modes, opt-in-only outreach with a 7-day per-domain cooldown and one-click unsubscribe, and one-click approval gates before directory submissions or forum replies publish.

Watch-outs

  • Read-only API access is gated to the $299/mo Concierge tier and above — the free plan and the two cheapest paid tiers ($59 Starter, $149 Growth) have no API at all, more restrictive than several rivals in this index that ship API on a lower tier or even free.
  • No independent reviews were found on G2 or Capterra at the time of this research — a G2 product page exists but shows no verified review count, so there is no third-party track record to weigh against the vendor's own claims.
  • Operated by BEJEWEAR OÜ, an Estonia-registered company; no individual founder, team size or funding is disclosed anywhere in its public material.
  • Full 10-engine coverage requires the $149/mo Growth tier or above; the free plan covers just 3 engines (Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot — notably not ChatGPT or Perplexity) and Starter covers only 6 of the 10.

Also note: The exact mechanics behind "Trust checks and proof packets" (Pro tier and up) and the autonomous agent's content-generation quality are described only at a high level in EdenRank's own marketing copy and weren't independently verifiable pre-signup.

Not for

EdenRank is probably not the right pick for Buyers who need API access below $299/month, or who want an independent review record to weigh against the vendor's own claims before buying — none was found as of this research.

How EdenRank compares

The other tools buyers weigh against EdenRank, and when to pick each.

ToolBest when you want…
EdenRankThis pageTeams that want a stricter, source-verifiable definition of AI citation than a self-reported visibility score, and are willing to pay into the Concierge or Agency tier for API access and the automated execution workflow.
Otterly AIA much longer independent-review track record and a real 7-day free trial, if EdenRank's unverified review history and no-trial paid tiers are a bigger concern than its stricter citation-vs-mention distinction.
AI SightlineA cheaper, more accessible API — included from the $0 free tier rather than gated to EdenRank's $299/mo Concierge plan — if programmatic access matters more than EdenRank's buying-intent lens and reputation-shield features.
ProfoundEdenRank's own comparison page concedes Profound's edge in prompt-volume intelligence from real user conversations, agent analytics and configurable optimization workflows, once you need enterprise-scale reach rather than EdenRank's stricter citation verification.

What is EdenRank?

EdenRank is an AI-visibility platform, styled by its own marketing as an "AI Citation OS," that measures where and how often a brand is cited — not merely mentioned — across up to ten AI answer engines, then runs a diagnose-create-earn-verify-report workflow to close the gaps it finds. It draws an explicit, stricter line between a "mention" (a brand named in an AI answer) and a "citation" (a source the AI answer actually attributes), backed by a public, reproducible evidence page showing its own prompt-level citation data over time. It is operated by BEJEWEAR OÜ, an Estonia-registered company; no individual founder, team size or funding is disclosed anywhere in its public material. A genuine forever-free tier (3 engines, 5 prompts/month, no card) sits below five paid tiers running from $59 to $449 per month.

What does EdenRank do?

EdenRank organizes its product around six steps it names Measure, Diagnose, Create, Earn, Verify and Report. Measure tracks brand mentions and citations by prompt and time window across up to ten engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Copilot and DeepSeek, plus Grok and Mistral from Growth up. Engine access is tier-gated: the free plan covers only Google AI Overviews, AI Mode and Copilot; Starter ($59/mo) unlocks 6 of the 10; Growth ($149/mo) and every tier above it unlock all 10. Diagnose analyzes answer position, sentiment, competitor presence and source domains behind each result. From Growth up, a "buying-intent lens" splits tracked prompts into comparison/pricing questions versus learning-stage queries and flags, daily, when a named competitor wins a high-intent prompt instead of the brand, citing a specific reason (pricing, features, reviews, integrations, or a missing page). From Pro ($199/mo) up, an "AI reputation shield" extracts the factual claims each engine makes about the brand daily, flags conflicts and suspected false claims, and drafts one-click corrections. Concierge ($299/mo) adds an autonomous execution agent with three disclosed risk modes (Conservative, Balanced, Aggressive) that can update llms.txt, submit pages to IndexNow, draft FAQ schema and comparison-page content, monitor Reddit and Hacker News for brand mentions with draft replies, and send opt-in outreach email — off by default, with A/B subject lines, a 7-day per-domain cooldown and one-click unsubscribe; directory submissions and forum replies require one-click approval before publishing. Concierge and Agency ($449/mo) are the only tiers with API access, and it is read-only. Agency adds white-label client reporting for agencies managing multiple brands.

Key features

  • Citation vs. mention tracking with a public proof page: Draws a stricter line than most rivals — a citation is a source an AI answer actually attributes, not just a brand name mentioned — backed by a public, reproducible evidence page of real prompt-level results.
  • Buying-intent lens: From the Growth tier up, separates tracked prompts into buying-intent vs. learning-stage queries and flags, daily, when a competitor wins a high-intent prompt instead of the brand, with a stated reason.
  • AI reputation shield: From the Pro tier up, extracts the factual claims AI engines make about the brand daily, flags conflicts and suspected false claims, and drafts one-click corrections.
  • Autonomous execution agent: On Concierge and above, an agent with three disclosed risk modes can update llms.txt, submit to IndexNow, draft FAQ/comparison-page content, monitor Reddit/Hacker News, and send opt-in outreach email with disclosed safety limits (7-day cooldown, one-click unsubscribe).
  • Read-only API: Available on the Concierge ($299/mo) and Agency ($449/mo) tiers only — the two cheapest paid tiers and the free plan have no API access.

What are EdenRank's use cases?

  • A stricter first check of true citation rate: A team wants to know not just whether a brand is mentioned by AI engines but whether it is actually cited as a source, using the free tier's Google AI Overviews/AI Mode/Copilot coverage as a first look.
  • Catching AI-invented claims about the brand: A brand on the Pro tier or above uses the AI reputation shield to catch a factual error an AI engine keeps repeating and drafts a correction in one click.
  • Agency managing multiple client citation programs: An agency on the Agency tier runs up to 20 client workspaces with white-label reporting, tracking buying-intent prompts across each brand.

Why use EdenRank?

  • A stricter, source-verifiable definition of "citation" than most rivals, backed by a public evidence page with real prompt-level results rather than a self-reported score.
  • The buying-intent lens names the specific reason a competitor wins a high-intent prompt (pricing, features, reviews, integrations, or a missing page) rather than leaving diagnosis to the buyer.
  • The Concierge-tier autonomous agent discloses real guardrails — three risk modes, opt-in-only outreach, a 7-day per-domain cooldown, one-click unsubscribe, and approval gates before anything publishes — rather than an unbounded auto-pilot.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Draws an explicit, stricter distinction between a "mention" and a "citation," backed by a public, reproducible /proof page showing real prompt-level evidence rather than a self-reported score.
  • The buying-intent lens (Growth tier and up) names a specific reason — pricing, features, reviews, integrations, or a missing page — when a named competitor wins a high-intent prompt instead of the brand, rather than a generic visibility score.
  • The Concierge-tier autonomous agent discloses real safety limits — three risk modes, opt-in-only outreach with a 7-day per-domain cooldown and one-click unsubscribe, and one-click approval gates before directory submissions or forum replies publish.

Cons

  • Read-only API access is gated to the $299/mo Concierge tier and above — the free plan and the two cheapest paid tiers ($59 Starter, $149 Growth) have no API at all, more restrictive than several rivals in this index that ship API on a lower tier or even free.
  • No independent reviews were found on G2 or Capterra at the time of this research — a G2 product page exists but shows no verified review count, so there is no third-party track record to weigh against the vendor's own claims.
  • Operated by BEJEWEAR OÜ, an Estonia-registered company; no individual founder, team size or funding is disclosed anywhere in its public material.
  • Full 10-engine coverage requires the $149/mo Growth tier or above; the free plan covers just 3 engines (Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot — notably not ChatGPT or Perplexity) and Starter covers only 6 of the 10.

Limitations

  • The exact mechanics behind "Trust checks and proof packets" (Pro tier and up) and the autonomous agent's content-generation quality are described only at a high level in EdenRank's own marketing copy and weren't independently verifiable pre-signup.

EdenRank pricing

Free forever (3 engines — Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot — 5 prompts/month, no card required) up to $449/month Agency (450 prompts, 20 workspaces, white-label client reports); Starter ($59/mo, 40 prompts, 6 of 10 engines), Growth ($149/mo, 100 prompts, all 10 engines), Pro ($199/mo, 200 prompts, AI reputation shield) and Concierge ($299/mo, autonomous agent, read-only API) sit between. No trial period on any paid tier — pricing verified directly on edenrank.com/pricing.

  • Free$0 / month
  • Starter$59 / month
  • Growth$149 / month
  • Pro$199 / month
  • Concierge$299 / month
  • Agency$449 / month

See current pricing on edenrank.com ↗Compare EdenRank alternatives →

EdenRank specs

Pricing

Pricing model
freemium
Free tier
✓ Yes

EdenRank review

EdenRank's stricter citation-versus-mention distinction and its public, reproducible /proof page are genuine differentiators in a category where most vendors' visibility scores can't be independently checked — but API access sits further behind price than most rivals in this index, and there is no independent review record yet to weigh against the vendor's own claims.

Every pricing figure here was verified directly on edenrank.com/pricing. Company-background facts (operating entity, absence of a named founder) trace to EdenRank's own editorial-policy and legal pages, not a third-party source, which is disclosed here rather than presented as independently corroborated. No G2 or Capterra review data could be confirmed despite a live G2 product page existing.

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between a "mention" and a "citation" on EdenRank?
EdenRank defines a citation as a source an AI engine's answer actually attributes or links, and a mention as simply being named in the answer text. Its public /proof page applies this to its own brand: over a recent 60-day window it measured 553 citations out of 6,809 total answers checked, an 8% citation rate, counting only owned-source citations and excluding third-party mentions.
Which AI engines does EdenRank track, and at which tier?
Up to 10, tier-dependent: the free plan covers Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and Microsoft Copilot only; Starter ($59/mo) unlocks 6 of the 10; Growth ($149/mo) and every tier above it unlock all 10, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Mistral and DeepSeek.
Does EdenRank have an API?
Yes, but only from the Concierge tier ($299/mo) up, and it is read-only. The free plan and the $59 Starter and $149 Growth tiers have no API access.
What does the autonomous agent on the Concierge and Agency tiers actually do?
It can update llms.txt, submit pages to IndexNow, draft FAQ schema and comparison-page content, monitor Reddit and Hacker News for brand mentions with draft replies, and send opt-in outreach email. It runs in one of three disclosed risk modes (Conservative, Balanced, Aggressive); directory submissions and forum replies require one-click approval before publishing, and outreach email is off by default with a 7-day per-domain cooldown and one-click unsubscribe.
Is there a free trial?
No — EdenRank's paid tiers have no trial period. Instead there is a genuine forever-free tier (3 engines, 5 prompts/month, no card required).
Who's behind EdenRank?
It's published and operated by BEJEWEAR OÜ, an Estonia-registered company. No individual founder, team size or funding is disclosed in its public material.

How EdenRank scores

The score is derived, never asserted — each part is computed from structure already on this page. Sorted by where EdenRank is strongest.

7.3/ 10Strong
  1. Freshness9.010% of the score

    How recently a verification pass re-checked the facts (decays as the record ages).

  2. Pricing transparency8.515% of the score

    Whether pricing is legible: named tiers, a concrete price anchor, a disclosed free trial.

  3. Depth7.918% of the score

    How much substantive structure is filled — features, use cases, FAQ, integrations and how-it-works, counted as a whole.

  4. Balance7.719% of the score

    How even-handed the verdict is beyond the bare minimum: extra genuine cons, real limitations, and a specific "who it is NOT for".

  5. Maturity5.913% of the score

    Signals it is a real, buildable product: a public API, first-party docs, a source repo, and a documented method.

  6. Evidence5.825% of the score

    How many independent domains the facts on this page cite, and how corroborated they are.

Paid placement feeds nothing into this number. The full rubric →

EdenRank alternatives

  • Otterly AI

    A much longer independent-review track record and a real 7-day free trial, if EdenRank's unverified review history and no-trial paid tiers are a bigger concern than its stricter citation-vs-mention distinction.

  • AI Sightline

    A cheaper, more accessible API — included from the $0 free tier rather than gated to EdenRank's $299/mo Concierge plan — if programmatic access matters more than EdenRank's buying-intent lens and reputation-shield features.

  • Profound

    EdenRank's own comparison page concedes Profound's edge in prompt-volume intelligence from real user conversations, agent analytics and configurable optimization workflows, once you need enterprise-scale reach rather than EdenRank's stricter citation verification.

Next steps

Help keep this page honest

This page is researched and re-verified by our editors. But the people who actually use EdenRank know things we cannot see from the outside.

Report an issueSomething wrong, outdated or a dead link? Tell us and we re-verify.
Write a reviewUsed EdenRank? Your experience helps the next buyer decide.

Get a quote from EdenRank

Tell us what you need. We make the introduction to EdenRank.

Stay current on AI visibility monitoring

This page changes when the product does. The digest carries new verdicts, re-verifications and what moved in the category: one short email, no drip.

Get weekly AI visibility monitoring updates

New tools and fresh verdicts. One short email, every week. One-click unsubscribe.

Facts re-verified 6 cited sourcesHow we rank →

EdenRank

from $0 / month

Visit ↗