Technical AEO fixes: a census of 124 listings

Schema deployment is an explicit service line covering six named JSON-LD types; llms.txt and crawler directives are never mentioned anywhere on the site.

Checked 2026-09-10

Structured data is covered by a JSON-LD generator and an Enterprise schema audit, but llms.txt and crawler directives are never mentioned anywhere on the site.

Checked 2026-09-10

Technical GEO opportunities cover robots.txt rules blocking AI agents, 404/403/5xx responses served to agents, missing structure and hidden JavaScript-rendered content.

Checked 2026-09-12

Crawlability, schema governance and entity work are named as standing plan inclusions, and the vendor sells schema markup as its own service line.

Checked 2026-09-10

Checks crawler access, schema markup and canonical/heading structure, and ships free robots.txt and llms.txt generators.

Checked 2026-10-14

Schema generation is an Action Engine capability, so it needs Pro or above; a free llms.txt generator and a robots.txt crawler-access check in the free audit sit outside the plans.

Checked 2026-09-08

Technical AEO sits outside the subscription product: a free llms.txt generator and crawlability checker, plus a paid technical audit sold by the agency arm from $750.

Checked 2026-10-04

Schema analysis is tiered (none on Free, Basic on Starter, autogeneration only on Business and above) and it flags blocked bots and missing discovery files.

Checked 2026-09-19

A technical pillar covers indexability, structured data, crawler policy and llms.txt, and free standalone tools check robots.txt, sitemap and schema signals.

Checked 2026-10-15

It diagnoses crawl and access problems such as blocked pages, rendering failures and paywalls, but the docs describe no schema markup, llms.txt or crawler-directive generation.

Checked 2026-10-15

An LLM.txt generator and website AI-readiness audit sit in the free tools set; the paid platform's docs describe no schema, llms.txt or crawler-directive feature.

Checked 2026-09-12

Schema and llms.txt work is explicit: the audit checks structured data and the product emits deploy-ready technical artefacts.

Checked 2026-10-15

AISpy itself never touches schema, llms.txt or robots directives; the company publishes a separate free web tool that checks whether a domain appears in Common Crawl, and its consultancy line sells technical audits covering structured data and crawlability.

Checked 2026-09-13

Manages robots.txt and llms.txt for AI crawlers and audits schema, sitemap and indexing access; available on both paid tiers.

Checked 2026-09-20

Covers schema only: it audits and emits Article and FAQPage JSON-LD, but nothing in the documented commands generates llms.txt, robots rules or other crawler directives for your site.

Checked 2026-09-12

The weekly site audit checks llms.txt, robots.txt, sitemap and JSON-LD schema explicitly for AI crawlers, and every generated article ships JSON-LD.

Checked 2026-10-04

Schema, crawlability, canonicals and sitemap coverage are named deliverables of the SEO system, which covers the technical side of answer-engine readiness.

Checked 2026-10-16

Site and Page Scan cover crawl access, robots rules, metadata, headings and schema, though the vendor says it is not a log-file or enterprise crawl suite.

Checked 2026-09-21

A technical module inspects crawlability, metadata and backend signals, and the vendor also pitches schema, FAQ and meta fixes as deliverables.

Checked 2026-09-09

Schema Agent deploys JSON-LD as pages change, and Agent Edge serves verified AI agents a lightweight markdown version at the CDN.

Checked 2026-09-11

Schema work is itemised down to the specific types and to @id cross-linking so the engines resolve one entity, and the studio publishes its own field guide on llms.txt; this is the strongest-evidenced half of the offer.

Checked 2026-09-08

Technical AEO is the core of the published methodology: JSON-LD carries the heaviest weight, with separate checks for llms.txt, robots.txt, sitemaps and AI bot access.

Checked 2026-10-03

Technical work is a GrowthOS feature, not a CheckThat one: its crawler runs a health audit whose schema category checks Article, FAQ, Breadcrumb and JSON-LD validity, while no llms.txt or crawler-directive tooling is documented.

Checked 2026-09-11

The tools directory carries a technical set covering llms.txt generation, JSON-LD schema and crawler directives, and Content Scoring scores Structured Data and Technical Health as named dimensions.

Checked 2026-09-13

It checks robots.txt, AI user-agent blocking, status codes and render-without-JS, plus content quotability, but does not generate schema or llms.txt.

Checked 2026-09-21

Scan checks structured data, schema and on-page markup, and Optimize returns concrete JSON-LD and meta-tag changes.

Checked 2026-09-24

A dedicated audit covers robots.txt rules per AI crawler, indexing directives, heading structure, JSON-LD schema and sameAs entity fields across 37 signals.

Checked 2026-10-08

Generates llms.txt, schema markup and FAQ blocks and flags crawlability problems as part of the technical audit toolbox.

Checked 2026-09-21

The crawler evaluates AEO-specific page signals including schema coverage and AI robot directives, shown beside traditional SEO health on the Pages and Issues dashboards.

Checked 2026-10-06

Free public tools generate an llms.txt draft, audit a single page for AI crawl and parse readiness, and preview platform fit; the managed service additionally covers crawling, indexing and structured data checks.

Checked 2026-09-15

Schema, entity graph, llms.txt and AI-crawler access form the first of the three pillars, and the sample report opens on a robots.txt blocking check.

Checked 2026-09-23

Technical work is limited to on-page structure: FAQ schema, internal-link maps and topical clusters. Nothing on llms.txt, crawler directives or site-wide technical audits is claimed.

Checked 2026-09-25

Covers llms.txt maintenance, IndexNow submission and FAQ schema in-product, plus free robots.txt crawler-access and llms.txt generator tools on the site.

Checked 2026-09-13

The FAQ names structured data and Schema markup among its website optimisation outputs, and the site audit scores crawler reachability and page structure.

Checked 2026-09-26

Technical items appear as per-type checklist cells to verify by hand, llms.txt and title tags among them, rather than as schema generation or crawler directive tooling.

Checked 2026-09-23

Site Audit checks robots rules, sitemaps, structured data and heading hierarchy for AI crawlers, but the plan table lists that website optimisation only under Enterprise.

Checked 2026-09-12

GEO audits produce ready-to-paste JSON-LD and check crawler reachability, but crawlability checks and bot analytics are both absent from the Starter tier.

Checked 2026-09-08

Structured data and schema work is named as one of six AEO elements, and technical architecture and indexation work is scheduled inside the first month of a campaign.

Checked 2026-10-16

Every audit checks crawler access, JSON-LD quality and citation readiness, and free tools cover robots.txt and schema generation.

Checked 2026-09-03

Pages published on the vendor's own CMS ship structured data and an llms.txt file automatically, including on its free hosting tier; on third-party CMSes schema is attached at publish time.

Checked 2026-10-03

Page-level structural work and AI bot log analysis are covered, but the vendor does not state that it generates schema markup, llms.txt files or crawler directives.

Checked 2026-10-05

Schema markup generation with completeness scoring is a paid-plan feature, and free standalone llms.txt and robots.txt generators sit under /tools.

Checked 2026-09-24

GEO Monitor itself does no schema, llms.txt or crawler-directive work and the vendor calls it a measurement tool; only the separate content pack ships JSON-LD alongside the pages it writes.

Checked 2026-09-14

An eleven-point audit checks robots.txt blocking of AI bots, rendering without JavaScript and schema presence, each scored pass or fail.

Checked 2026-09-14

Technical AEO is the core of the tool channel: a JSON-LD generator for Organization and WebSite, an llms.txt drafter, plus Schema.org detection that lists which types the page already exposes and which are missing.

Checked 2026-09-19

Technical work is limited to Enterprise crawler features — identifying AI agents hitting the site and serving them optimised content; no schema, llms.txt or robots directive tooling is described anywhere.

Checked 2026-09-24

Technical AEO is the core of the product: crawler directives in robots.txt, llms.txt, canonical, noindex, render-without-JavaScript and JSON-LD all score inside the System readiness category.

Checked 2026-09-14

It audits crawlability and indexability for AI bots, and paid plans deliver structured data and schema markup implementation on a monthly page quota.

Checked 2026-09-25

Technical work covers crawling, rendering, indexation and JSON-LD structured data as an evidence layer, while llms.txt is called optional and not the main lever.

Checked 2026-10-03

Schema, IndexNow, sitemap coverage and internal linking are named as GEO workstreams, and the separate technical SEO service adds robots.txt, canonical and JavaScript indexation review.

Checked 2026-09-14

The technical agent covers schema markup, robots.txt, llm.txt generation and sitemap repair, and that row is checked on every brand plan including Core.

Checked 2026-09-15

Technical answer-engine work is an explicit part of the engagement: JSON-LD schema types are named, and the stack lists a dedicated 'Schema + signals' component labelled technical AEO.

Checked 2026-09-27

One of the four scored areas is technical: bot accessibility and basic structural readability, and separate free HITZ tools cover llms.txt and schema/JSON-LD validation on their own pages.

Checked 2026-09-17

The technical site audit checks structured data, canonical tags, page speed signals and crawlability; the API also exposes an UPDATE_ROBOTS action category.

Checked 2026-09-02

The platform generates llms.txt files, injects validated JSON-LD schema on publish and audits crawlability and AI bot accessibility.

Checked 2026-10-07

Solutions Engineering and the Relevance Engineering Technical Assessment cover crawler accessibility, structured data, templates and passage-level retrieval barriers, which is the technical half of AEO delivered as an audit plus implementation support.

Checked 2026-09-26

It actively tests AI bot access and analyses robots.txt and access configuration, but the vendor's own pages do not claim schema markup or llms.txt generation.

Checked 2026-10-10

Crawler-side technical work only: it surfaces which pages bots fetch and where blockers sit, but no schema, llms.txt or robots tooling is claimed in the product.

Checked 2026-09-03

JSON-LD validation, robots.txt and header checks for named AI user agents, and semantic HTML scoring are all published capabilities of the readiness and on-page tools.

Checked 2026-09-03

A dedicated technical GEO toolkit covers robots.txt auditing for AI bots, llms.txt generation and schema/structured-data recommendations, with several checkers free and account-free.

Checked 2026-09-27

Two free technical tools ship alongside the tracker: an llms.txt generator and a crawlability checker that fetches pages with the GPTBot user agent.

Checked 2026-10-11

The Site Audit module explicitly checks AI-bot access, text structure and AI schema, and scores AEO readiness alongside traditional SEO health; schema markup appears as its own fix layer.

Checked 2026-09-26

The agent audits site metadata and schema and crawls pages AI platforms cite, but the vendor describes auditing and recommending rather than generating llms.txt or crawler directives.

Checked 2026-10-11

Every Oracle mission includes a technical accessibility audit, but the vendor never names schema, llms.txt or crawler directives specifically.

Checked 2026-10-03

Structured data is named as advice a buyer should act on, but no schema generation, llms.txt handling or crawler-directive tooling is documented anywhere.

Checked 2026-09-18

Generated pages ship a JSON-LD block, and the site offers a schema markup generator, an llms.txt generator and a GEO audit that scores crawler access for GPTBot and ClaudeBot.

Checked 2026-09-09

Technical AEO appears only as a diagnostic inside the free report, which checks robots.txt, AI-crawler blocking and llms.txt; no schema or directive implementation service is described anywhere.

Checked 2026-09-27

The readiness score explicitly grades JSON-LD schema validity, robots rules and AI-crawler allowances, and server-rendered content, with a site audit on paid tiers.

Checked 2026-10-14

It automates on-page and technical fixes such as title tags, meta descriptions, alt tags, broken links and URLs, but the site documents no schema markup, llms.txt or crawler-directive features.

Checked 2026-09-27

Site Audit covers classic technical hygiene — crawl errors, canonicals, meta tags — but the vendor never mentions schema markup, llms.txt or AI-crawler directives.

Checked 2026-09-28

Through its GitHub connector the agent opens pull requests carrying llms.txt, robots.txt and schema changes, so technical AEO fixes are shipped rather than only advised.

Checked 2026-09-28

They assess crawler access, bot-management rules, rendering and semantic structure for AI discovery, and a case study documents schema and FAQ implementation on priority pages.

Checked 2026-09-28

Robots-level work is real: the platform audits robots.txt against known AI user agents and correlates blocks with citation loss, and free generators emit JSON-LD schema plus robots/Cloudflare/Next.js bot rules. No llms.txt feature.

Checked 2026-09-03

Technical AEO is one of their named workstreams: entity and FAQ schema, a maintained llms.txt file and opening crawler access for the major AI bots.

Checked 2026-09-28

Technical SEO checks are real — indexability signals, Lighthouse, URL inspection — but AEO-specific work such as llms.txt or agent readiness checks is roadmap, not shipped.

Checked 2026-09-09

Schema implementation, entity graph work and AI-crawler-accessible architecture are a named service line, and the technical foundation phase audits robots.txt access before any content work starts.

Checked 2026-09-03

Checks structured data, canonicals and crawl access per page and has an agent that repairs those issues, not merely a report of them.

Checked 2026-09-29

It audits robots.txt and bot access and scores AI readiness, so it diagnoses technical AEO problems, but the vendor does not claim it writes schema or llms.txt for you.

Checked 2026-09-29

Crawler access, robots.txt, sitemaps, structured data and thin or duplicate pages are monitored and fixed, and the same audit is exposed as an MCP tool.

Checked 2026-10-07

Crawler directives are properly covered - robots.txt is evaluated bot by bot and crawl errors are surfaced - but no documented feature generates schema markup or an llms.txt file.

Checked 2026-09-03

Schema engineering is a core part of the offer, with named schema types implemented on client pages as the technical foundation for citation; no llms.txt or crawler-directive claim is made.

Checked 2026-09-29

Covers robots.txt per AI bot, llms.txt and ai.txt validity, and JSON-LD schema coverage, with a schema generator among the free tools.

Checked 2026-09-29

Crawler-side work is limited to verified bot logging and pushing new URLs at AI crawlers; I found no schema markup, llms.txt or robots directive management for your own site.

Checked 2026-09-09

A Technical Optimization row is ticked from the entry plan, and the Sitemap Health tab reports HTTP status, speed and missing SEO elements from Promptwatch's own crawl of sitemap pages.

Checked 2026-09-30

Site Readiness checks robots.txt against AI crawler user agents, generates an llms.txt file and returns a readiness score, which is technical AEO work rather than reporting.

Checked 2026-10-10

Free standalone tools validate and generate llms.txt files, but no schema or crawler-directive work appears inside the paid tracking platform itself.

Checked 2026-09-30

Site Auditor reports robots directives, schema, canonicals and AI crawler access from robots.txt.

Technical AEO is delivered as free standalone checkers for schema, robots.txt and llms.txt rather than as monitored, fix-tracked work inside the paid product itself.

Checked 2026-10-13

Technical AEO work appears on both sides of the product: the article pipeline applies schema markup and canonicals automatically, and the vendor publishes free llms.txt, robots.txt and schema checking tools for AI crawlers.

Checked 2026-10-11

The audit validates schema, checks robots.txt against named AI crawler agents, and a free generator builds the llms.txt file it looks for.

Checked 2026-10-12

The audit engine runs a schema module and an AI-crawlability module rule-based, penalising blocked AI bots and markup that diverges from visible content.

Checked 2026-09-30

Schema, server-side rendering and crawler policy are explicit implementation deliverables, and structured data recommendations follow public specifications rather than anything proprietary to the vendor.

Checked 2026-09-26

Schema building and an llms.txt generator ship in every platform tier, and crawling and rendering fixes are part of the service.

Checked 2026-10-13

Audits blocked AI user agents, robots.txt, JavaScript rendering and raw-HTML content availability.

Checked 2026-09-02

Technical audits cover schema markup, content structure and crawlability for AI bots, with 200 to 3,000 page audits a month by plan.

Checked 2026-10-13

The Site Audit AI Search Health widget scores schema markup, internal linking, llms.txt and robots.txt directives against eight named AI crawlers, capped at 100 pages on the entry plan.

Checked 2026-09-18

Structured data is written and repaired per page type, and robots.txt is checked against AI answer crawlers, though robots.txt edits are staged for the buyer to paste.

Checked 2026-10-03

AutoFix writes schema, metadata, alt text, headings and canonicals without a developer, and the crawler scores AI citation eligibility; the published fix list stops short of llms.txt and robots.txt edits.

Checked 2026-09-15

It recommends technical fixes such as FAQ schema and audits pages for missing schema, but the vendor describes advice and auditing rather than shipping llms.txt or crawler directives for you.

Checked 2026-10-08

Schema markup generation and canonicalisation/indexation work are offered; no llms.txt or crawler-directive claim.

Checked 2026-09-02

A site-wide technical crawl ships in the $333/$399 AEO+SEO tiers, but the vendor names no schema, llms.txt or AI-crawler-directive checks anywhere on the site.

AEO guidance is editorial — manual AI Overview worksheets and source-clarity advice — with no schema, llms.txt or crawler-directive tooling offered.

Checked 2026-10-10

AI Pages serves crawler-specific versions of pages via Cloudflare Workers, and the crawler Access tab reports robots.txt and llms.txt findings alongside schema recommendations.

Checked 2026-09-16

The GEO checker tests llms.txt, Schema.org markup, JavaScript-hidden copy, lang/hreflang and local signals, which is the technical half of making a page legible to answer engines.

Checked 2026-09-17

Site Audit covers crawlability, indexing and technical barriers and frames them as AI discoverability; no vendor page we read claims schema markup or llms.txt generation.

Checked 2026-09-02

Crawler directives, schema and llms.txt are the core of the fix list, and the paid tiers hand back ready-to-paste files for them.

Checked 2026-09-18

A technical health check and drafted fixes are claimed on the blog; no llms.txt or crawler-directive tooling is offered, and the schema-patching agent is Coming soon.

Schema, crawler access and first-paragraph citability are scored by the sibling CRO Scanner's AI Citability Index, not by Radar, which only measures citations after the fact.

Checked 2026-10-12

Site Audit reports structured data and robots directives on all tiers; Action Center technical actions start at Growth.

Checked 2026-09-02