Skip to content

The neutral index of AI-visibility & GEO tools

Head to head

OtterlyAI vs Peec AI

Entry-level self-serve simplicity versus mid-market analytical depth, the AI-visibility baseline choice. Concretely: $29/month for four engines watched out of the box, against a €85–€425 ladder that asks a higher floor and returns per-engine strategy, source-level targeting and multi-brand workspaces for it.

Otterly AI and Peec AI both measure how AI answer engines mention your brand, but they serve different phases of a team's AI-visibility journey.

Otterly is the accessible entry point: self-serve plans starting at $29/month (Lite, 15 prompts), $189 (Standard, 100 prompts), $489 (Premium, 400 prompts) plus a custom Enterprise plan, with annual discounts. It tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot by default; Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude cost extra as add-ons. Monitoring volume (how many prompts, how often) is the main pricing lever between tiers; API and MCP access are included from Standard upward, but not on Lite.

Peec is positioned for mid-market teams and agencies, with published tiers from €85/month (Starter, 50 prompts) to €425/month (Advanced, 350 prompts) plus a custom Enterprise plan. In exchange for the higher price, you get a wider 6-engine pool to pick 3 from per project, per-engine breakdowns that go deeper, a citation-source view that directly informs GEO strategy (the sources already cited are where to earn mentions), and multi-brand workspaces built for running several clients side by side, a feature Otterly does not emphasize. Peec's own API access is reserved for its custom Enterprise plan, same as Otterly gates API/MCP behind Standard and up.

The honest trade-off: Otterly is perfect for a team just getting started with AI visibility and trying to justify the spend. Peec is what you move to when you are ready to do the research deeper: per-engine strategy, source-level targeting, and managing multiple brands at once.

How OtterlyAI and Peec AI compare

Scroll across to compare every side. Feature names stay in view.One card per question, with every side answering it in turn.

FeatureOtterlyAIVisit OtterlyAI ↗Peec AIVisit Peec AI ↗
DescriptionAI search monitoring for brand mentions and website citations across seven answer engines.Tracks brand visibility, position and sentiment in AI answers, with source, competitor and crawler reporting.
Pricingfrom $29/monthfrom €85/month
TagsAI OverviewsAPIBrand monitoringChatGPTCopilotFree trialPerplexityFor agenciesAI OverviewsBrand monitoringChatGPTCopilotFree trialGeminiPerplexity
Pricing modelsubscriptionsubscription
Free tierNoNo
Optimises your contentYesPartly
Generates contentPartlyNo
Technical AEOYesPartly
Done-for-you servicePartly (Enterprise, available higher)No
GeminiPartly (Google Gemini add-on, costs extra)Yes
Google AI ModePartly (Google AI Mode add-on, costs extra)Yes
ClaudePartly (Claude add-on, costs extra)Partly (Enterprise (brand plans); Scale (agency plans), available higher)
GrokNoPartly (Enterprise, available higher)
DeepSeekNoPartly (Enterprise (brand plans); Scale (agency plans), available higher)
Coverage in the vendor’s wordsYesPartly
AI crawler analyticsPartlyYes
Wrong answers about you-Yes
Projects or brandsPartly (Lite, available higher)Yes
CountriesYesPartly
APIPartly (Standard, available higher)Partly (Enterprise, available higher)
MCP serverPartly (Standard, available higher)Yes
BI exportPartly (Standard, available higher)Partly (Advanced, available higher)
Limitations
  • Monitoring volume is capped per tier. Meaningful prompt coverage pushes you up the ladder quickly. 15/100/400 prompts a month across Lite/Standard/Premium. (1 source)
  • API and MCP access are gated to Standard ($189/month) and up. The entry Lite plan at $29/month has neither. (2 sources)
  • Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are not in the 4-engine default set on any plan. They are paid add-ons, and the per-engine add-on price is not published on the pricing or help pages. (1 source)
  • API access and the MCP server are both reserved for the custom Enterprise plan; no self-serve tier (Starter / Pro / Advanced) includes either. (2 sources)
  • Claude Sonnet 4, GPT 5 Search, Deepseek, Qwen and Mistral are Enterprise-only. Self-serve customers who need Claude pay full Enterprise pricing to get it. (1 source)
  • The Read API is documented as beta; endpoints and payload shapes are subject to change. (1 source)

Who each one is for

OtterlyAI

Marketing, SEO and content teams taking their first serious measurement of AI-search visibility, who want a self-serve start rather than a sales call.

From $29/month

Peec AI

mid-market marketing teams and agencies running AI-visibility programs

From €85/month

Verdict: OtterlyAI or Peec AI?

Solo founders or startups watching only ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews → Otterly. Mid-market teams or agencies needing deeper analytics and multi-client workspaces → Peec. The threshold is usually not budget but whether anyone owns the output: Otterly answers whether you are mentioned, Peec answers what to do about it, and the second is only worth paying for when someone has time to act on it.

The digest

Decided? Watch the rankings move. Who's winning AI citations, one short email, every Tuesday.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheapest?
Otterly. Entry is $29/month (Lite) versus Peec's €85/month (Starter), both with annual discounts.
Which covers more AI engines?
Peec has the wider pool: 6 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, Gemini), pick 3 per project. Otterly tracks 4 by default (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Copilot); AI Mode, Gemini and Claude cost extra as add-ons.
Does either have an API?
Otterly includes API/MCP access from its Standard tier ($189/mo) up, but not on Lite. Peec reserves API access for its custom Enterprise plan; none of its self-serve tiers (Starter/Pro/Advanced) include it.
Which shows which sources engines cite?
Peec emphasizes this as a core feature (the citation-source view becomes a GEO target list). Otterly focuses on brand mentions and share-of-voice.
Which is better for agencies?
Peec has multi-brand workspaces purpose-built for agencies; Otterly is built more for in-house teams.
When would a team move from Otterly to Peec?
Once monitoring across Otterly's 4 default engines (or its paid add-ons) is not enough, or when source-level analysis and multi-brand management become needed, typically as AI visibility becomes a real business lever.

Still deciding? Get a quote from OtterlyAI or Peec AI

Choose a provider and tell them what you need.

Who should reply?

Advertise here

Reach buyers mid-decision. Reach teams choosing AI-visibility tools. Promote your brand with a display placement or bring your listing into focus with Featured.

Explore owner options →Advertise on this page →

The digestFree

Who's winning AI citations.

What we re-checked, what got added, and one number from the index. Tuesdays.

One-click unsubscribe

At a glance

Entry-level self-serve simplicity versus mid-market analytical depth, the AI-visibility baseline choice. Concretely: $29/month for four engines watched out of the box, against a €85–€425 ladder that asks a higher floor and returns per-engine strategy, source-level targeting and multi-brand workspaces for it.