# HITZ GEO Page Audit — Free browser check that scores one URL out of 100 on four AI-answer readiness signals.

> Source: CitedIndex — https://citedindex.com/hitz-geo-page-audit (structured, researched, re-verified)
> Facts last verified: 2026-09-17

HITZ GEO page audit is a free browser tool from a Kazakhstan- and Uzbekistan-based GEO agency that scores one URL out of 100. The check covers direct answer, entity, trust and technical setup, and is positioned as a quick check rather than a full audit.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Website | https://hitz.agency/tools/geo-audit |
| Price | Yes. Every tool on this page is free and works without signup. |
| Free tier | Yes |

One URL per run, checked in the browser with no signup or card. The vendor publishes no quota, expiry or rate limit, and the result is a score with one recommendation line per area rather than a report.

## What it does

**Monitors AI answers** · No — The tool never queries an AI engine; it fetches the URL you submit and scores its structure, while measuring how a brand actually shows up in AI answers is explicitly reserved for the agency's full audit.

> No. They find separate technical and content signals. A full audit also covers demand, competitors, site structure, and actual brand visibility.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools · FAQ, answer to 'Do the tools replace a full audit'

**Optimises your content** · Yes — It analyses a page you already have and returns a score per area with a short fix line; my run on hitz.agency/en scored 84 and told me to add a short answer after the H1 and question-based subheadings.

> Results take about ten seconds. The tool scores page structure against core GEO signals and does not replace a full audit.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · Quick check block, note beneath the Page URL field and Check page button

**Generates content** · No — Nothing in the four-area check writes copy; sibling HITZ tools build an llms.txt file, a schema block and a prompt list, but no tool on the site drafts articles or page text.

> Results take about ten seconds. The tool scores page structure against core GEO signals and does not replace a full audit.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · Quick check block, note beneath the Page URL field

**Publishes to your site** · No — The audit is read-only against a public URL and returns an on-screen score; there is no account, no CMS connection and nothing is written back to the site being checked.

> Check how ready a page is to become a source for AI answers.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · Page hero, subheading under the H1 'GEO page audit'

**Technical AEO** · Yes — One of the four scored areas is technical: bot accessibility and basic structural readability, and separate free HITZ tools cover llms.txt and schema/JSON-LD validation on their own pages.

> Whether the page is open to bots and whether its basic structure is readable.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · 'What the quick audit covers', item 04 Technical setup

**Done-for-you service** · Yes — The tool is published by a working GEO agency whose people do the optimisation under flat monthly retainers, so the human service is a separate paid engagement rather than part of this free check.

> Тариф Start стоит 700 долларов в месяц, Optimal 1000 долларов, Pro 1500 долларов.
> — https://hitz.agency/ · FAQ 05, «Сколько стоит GEO-продвижение?»

## Answer engines

**ChatGPT** · Partly — The free page audit queries ChatGPT never; ChatGPT mentions and citations are watched only inside the agency's paid GEO retainer, measured through third-party tools rather than by this checker.

> следим за упоминаниями и цитатами в ChatGPT, Perplexity, Алисе и Gemini
> — https://hitz.agency/geo · «Что входит в GEO-продвижение», блок «Мониторинг видимости»

**Perplexity** · Partly — Perplexity appears only in the retainer's visibility monitoring line, not in the page audit, which performs no engine query at all and scores page structure instead.

> следим за упоминаниями и цитатами в ChatGPT, Perplexity, Алисе и Gemini
> — https://hitz.agency/geo · «Что входит в GEO-продвижение», блок «Мониторинг видимости»

**Gemini** · Partly — Gemini is named in the paid monitoring scope and in the agency's free PDF site audit, but the browser page-audit tool listed here does not send anything to Gemini.

> следим за упоминаниями и цитатами в ChatGPT, Perplexity, Алисе и Gemini
> — https://hitz.agency/geo · «Что входит в GEO-продвижение», блок «Мониторинг видимости»

**Google AI Overviews** · No — Google AI Overviews is outside the vendor's fixed five-system measurement set and outside the four areas this tool scores, so neither the free check nor the paid measurement reports it.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

**Google AI Mode** · No — Google AI Mode is named nowhere on the site as a tracked or checked surface, and the vendor's own complete list of tracked systems stops at five that do not include it.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

**Claude** · Partly — Claude sits in the agency's stated tracked set and in its free PDF audit deliverable, yet it is absent from the retainer page's own monitoring line and from this tool entirely.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

**Microsoft Copilot** · No — Microsoft Copilot is absent from the vendor's fixed tracked set and from every engine list on the service pages; the page audit itself queries no engine whatsoever.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

**Grok** · Partly — Grok appears in one client case as an engine whose mentions were monitored and in the GEO hero line, but it is missing from the fixed five-system set the vendor says it measures.

> Мониторили упоминания в Яндекс Алисе, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude
> — https://hitz.agency/ · «Недавние кейсы», кейс «SaaS / AI-продукт», блок «процесс»

**DeepSeek** · No — DeepSeek is named on no page of the site, and the vendor's own enumerated tracking set of five systems excludes it, as do the four areas this page audit scores.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

**Meta AI** · No — Meta AI is not part of the vendor's stated fixed measurement set and appears in no engine list on the service, tool or audit pages I read.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

**Coverage in the vendor’s words** · Partly — This free tool tracks zero engines; the agency states a fixed set of five, while its retainer page names only four and a client case adds Grok, so the coverage claim varies by page.

> ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Alice. The set is fixed across measurements so that results stay comparable between months.
> — https://hitz.agency/en · FAQ 04, answer to 'Which AI systems does HITZ track'

## What it reports

**Names the cited sources** · No — The score judges whether your own page could be lifted into an answer; it never reports which domains or pages the engines actually cite, which the vendor places in the full audit.

> No. They find separate technical and content signals. A full audit also covers demand, competitors, site structure, and actual brand visibility.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools · FAQ, answer to 'Do the tools replace a full audit'

**Competitor tracking** · No — One URL goes in and one score comes out, with no rival brand or comparison view; the vendor states competitors are covered by the full audit rather than by the free tools.

> No. They find separate technical and content signals. A full audit also covers demand, competitors, site structure, and actual brand visibility.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools · FAQ, answer to 'Do the tools replace a full audit'

**Brand sentiment** · No — The entity area only checks whether the page makes clear which company or service it is about; it reports no attributes, sentiment or associations an AI system holds about the brand.

> Whether it is clear which company, service, product, or specialist the page is about.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · 'What the quick audit covers', item 02 Entity

**Recommendations** · Yes — It prioritises rather than only reporting: the weakest area is flagged first and re-running after a fix is the stated workflow, with one recommendation line rendered per area.

> Fix the lowest-scoring area first, then run the check again and compare.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · 'HOW TO USE THE RESULT' block

**AI crawler analytics** · No — The technical area only judges whether the submitted page is open to bots; it shows no crawl visits, and even the separate HITZ crawler tool reads robots.txt rules rather than server logs.

> Whether the page is open to bots and whether its basic structure is readable.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · 'What the quick audit covers', item 04 Technical setup

**Wrong answers about you** · No — Because the check reads your page and asks no engine anything, it cannot surface a false statement an AI system makes about the brand; the blog discusses the problem but the product does not detect it.

> Results take about ten seconds. The tool scores page structure against core GEO signals and does not replace a full audit.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · Quick check block, note beneath the Page URL field

## Plans and signing up

**How often it checks** · Partly — On demand only: each result comes from a URL you paste, and re-checking after a fix is a manual repeat with no scheduling, alerting or recurring run offered anywhere.

> Fix the lowest-scoring area first, then run the check again and compare.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools/geo-audit · 'HOW TO USE THE RESULT' block

**Card required to start** · No — No card and no account are involved: the vendor states every tool works without signup, and my run returned a full score without an email gate or paywall.

> Yes. Every tool on this page is free and works without signup.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools · FAQ, answer to 'Are the tools free'

**Self-serve signup** · Yes — Entirely self-serve for the tool itself: paste a URL, press the button, read the score in about ten seconds with no sales contact, although the agency work behind it is quote-led.

> Yes. Every tool on this page is free and works without signup.
> — https://hitz.agency/en/tools · FAQ, answer to 'Are the tools free'

_Not established: Prompt or credit allowance_

## Provenance

Every fact above comes from the vendor. Nothing here is independently corroborated yet.

## Coverage elsewhere

None recorded. Every fact above comes from the vendor and is not independently corroborated yet.

## What changed

- 2026-09-17 — Capabilities · Free tier · Price

## Correcting this record

Anything marked "Not established" is a question we have not answered — it is not a No. If you represent HITZ GEO Page Audit, or anything here is wrong or out of date, you can supply it with a source: the operations this site accepts from an agent are listed at https://citedindex.com/.well-known/agents.json — that catalogue needs no key to read, and each entry states its own auth.

Supplying evidence is free. Nothing that can be bought here changes what a field says, whether a gap is closed, or how this record is scored.