# Epovest — Prepaid AI visibility platform that asks your prompts to six engines and archives every answer.

> Source: CitedIndex — https://citedindex.com/epovest (structured, researched, re-verified)
> Facts last verified: 2026-09-23

Epovest is an AI visibility platform that asks a brand's own prompts to six AI engines on a schedule and archives every full answer with its cited sources. It ships a suite for canon, official pages, corroborations and a source map around that measurement.

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Website | https://epovest.com |
| Price | from $0.10/check pay-as-you-go |
| Free tier | No |

No standing $0 plan and no trial: the suite comes with the account but nothing measures until prepaid credits are bought, minimum top-up $10, and a balance that runs out pauses the trackers.

## What it does

**Monitors AI answers** · Yes — Trackers ask your own prompts to the chosen engines at your cadence and archive every full answer with the sources cited, so what the engines say is the core measurement.

> A tracker asks your prompts, word for word, to the engines you picked, at your cadence: monthly, weekly or daily.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/tracking · Section 'From answers to numbers you can verify', opening paragraph

**Optimises your content** · Partly — It points at what to fix through checklists, the Atlas source ranking and a quest queue, but it does not analyse the text of your existing pages and return page-level rewrites.

> Epovest measures what the engines say on your prompts, shows you where to appear and what to fix, and proves what changed.
> — https://epovest.com/en · Hero paragraph under 'Make AIs recommend you'

**Generates content** · No — The canon, the one reference text the suite is built around, is written by the customer in their own words; no tool on the site writes new content for them.

> Write it once Decide what the AIs should say: your one-liner, your short and long descriptions, your category, the claims that set you apart, your contact facts. Your words, in your canonical language
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/canon · 'How you set your canon', step 1

**Publishes to your site** · No — Alignment work is done by hand on each page and then recorded; the published API surface, which the vendor says covers everything the app shows, carries no publishing route to any CMS.

> Verify each item on the page itself: the canon version and the date are frozen on the cell.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/surfaces · 'How you align your official pages', step 3 'Verified, dated'

**Technical AEO** · Partly — Technical items appear as per-type checklist cells to verify by hand, llms.txt and title tags among them, rather than as schema generation or crawler directive tooling.

> Each type has its checklist, ticked per language: title tags, descriptions, the llms.txt of a website. It guides the work, item by item.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/surfaces · 'How you align your official pages', step 2 'Work through the checklist'

**Done-for-you service** · No — The published price list is four metered software services with no engagement, retainer or done-for-you line; support is answered by email only.

> One prepaid credit balance. Each service debits its unit price when it runs, and only then. No subscription, no plan: the grid below is the whole price list.
> — https://epovest.com/en/pricing · Intro paragraph above the Service/Price table

## Answer engines

**ChatGPT** · Yes — ChatGPT is one of the six selectable engines and is priced at the base rate of $0.10 per prompt, per check.

> ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Mistral and Grok, through their official APIs, at your rhythm from daily to monthly.
> — https://epovest.com/en/why-epovest · FAQ, 'Which AI engines does Epovest measure?'

**Perplexity** · Yes — Perplexity is a selectable engine on any tracker, billed at the base check price of $0.10 per prompt per check.

> `chatgpt`, `claude`, `gemini`, `perplexity`, `mistral`, `grok`. A check is priced per engine, in USD: `chatgpt` 0.10, `claude` 0.20, `gemini` 0.10, `perplexity` 0.10, `mistral` 0.10, `grok` 0.20.
> — https://epovest.com/docs/api.md · 'Creating a tracker' table, engines[] row

**Gemini** · Yes — Gemini is among the six engines a tracker can query, at the base $0.10 check price, read and reported separately from the others.

> ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Mistral and Grok are measured side by side and read one by one, because they do not lean on the same sources
> — https://epovest.com/en/why-epovest · Section 'Engine by engine', opening sentence

**Google AI Overviews** · No — Google AI Overviews is absent from the vendor's complete engine inventory, which names six engines answering the direct question of which engines it measures.

> ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Mistral and Grok, through their official APIs, at your rhythm from daily to monthly.
> — https://epovest.com/en/why-epovest · FAQ, 'Which AI engines does Epovest measure?'

**Google AI Mode** · No — Google AI Mode is not covered: the engine enum accepted by the tracker API lists six values and AI Mode is not one of them.

> `chatgpt`, `claude`, `gemini`, `perplexity`, `mistral`, `grok`.
> — https://epovest.com/docs/api.md · 'Creating a tracker' table, engines[] row, accepted values

**Claude** · Yes — Claude is tracked, but its check costs double the base rate because the vendor says it reads more sources per answer.

> Check on Claude or Grok | one prompt, asked once to Claude or Grok, which read more sources per answer | $0.20
> — https://epovest.com/en/pricing · Price grid, 'Check on Claude or Grok' row

**Microsoft Copilot** · No — Microsoft Copilot is not among the engines: the vendor's own answer to which engines it measures names six, and Copilot is absent from the API enum too.

> ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Mistral and Grok, through their official APIs, at your rhythm from daily to monthly.
> — https://epovest.com/en/why-epovest · FAQ, 'Which AI engines does Epovest measure?'

**Grok** · Yes — Grok is a selectable engine, priced at $0.20 per check rather than $0.10 because it reads more sources per answer.

> On Claude and Grok, a check is $0.20: these two engines read more sources per answer.
> — https://epovest.com/en/pricing · Section 'The check, the unit of measurement'

**DeepSeek** · No — DeepSeek is not supported: the tracker API enumerates the engines a check can be sent to and DeepSeek is not among the six accepted values.

> `chatgpt`, `claude`, `gemini`, `perplexity`, `mistral`, `grok`.
> — https://epovest.com/docs/api.md · 'Creating a tracker' table, engines[] row, accepted values

**Meta AI** · No — Meta AI is not covered; the vendor's complete engine list names six engines, Mistral being the sixth rather than Meta AI.

> ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Mistral and Grok, through their official APIs, at your rhythm from daily to monthly.
> — https://epovest.com/en/why-epovest · FAQ, 'Which AI engines does Epovest measure?'

**Coverage in the vendor’s words** · Yes — Six engines, chosen per tracker with no tier gating: every engine costs $0.10 a check except Claude and Grok at $0.20, so coverage is bounded by budget, not by plan.

> A check is priced per engine, in USD: `chatgpt` 0.10, `claude` 0.20, `gemini` 0.10, `perplexity` 0.10, `mistral` 0.10, `grok` 0.20.
> — https://epovest.com/docs/api.md · 'Creating a tracker' table, engines[] row

## What it reports

**Names the cited sources** · Yes — Every check records the pages the engine cited, and those domains build the Atlas, ranked per engine by an AI Authority score out of 100.

> Each domain enters the Atlas with its AI Authority and its detection count, and stays there as a series.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/tracking · 'Every survey widens your Atlas', step 3

**Competitor tracking** · Yes — Rival names are tracked as keywords in the same scoreboard, and a separate Competitor Scan reads the places that cite three to five rivals.

> A Competitor Scan asks about three to five of your competitors at once, and turns the answers into the list of places that carry your market, with one more thing on each: whether you are there.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/competitors · Hero paragraph under 'The places that carry your competitors, in one list'

**Brand sentiment** · Partly — Tone analysis exists but is an optional metered AI analyst charged per analysed answer, so brand perception is not included in the base check price.

> Two AI analysts are optional: sentiment (in what terms each keyword is spoken of) and custom analysis (your own instruction applied to every answer). Each costs $0.05 per analysed answer
> — https://epovest.com/en/pricing · Section 'Analysts: free lenses, metered AI options'

**Recommendations** · Partly — It converts measurement into a queue of moves and a way in per source, but the recommendations are place-level and manual rather than edits to a specific page.

> Each place says the move that takes you there: open your page, join the conversation, pitch the editor, file the listing. Target a page and it lands in your quest file
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/competitors · 'How a scan runs', step 3 'Take your spots'

**AI crawler analytics** · No — Nothing watches AI bots on your site; the engines are queried through their official APIs instead.

> Your prompts are asked word for word through the engines' official APIs, and every full answer is kept.
> — https://epovest.com/en · 'Real prompts, real answers' feature block; the enumerated suite contains no crawler log tool

## Plans and signing up

**Prompt or credit allowance** · Yes — There is no prompt allowance at all: you buy credits and each prompt asked to one engine once debits $0.10, so volume is whatever the balance covers.

> 1 prompt × 1 AI engine × 1 check = $0.10
> — https://epovest.com/en/pricing · Section 'The check, the unit of measurement'

**Projects or brands** · Yes — Several brands are supported: trackers file under projects, one per client or brand, and the vendor states no cap beyond the credit balance.

> As many trackers as you need No cap. An agency runs one per client, and the only bound is your credit balance.
> — https://epovest.com/en · Section 'Built for volume', first bullet

**Countries** · Partly — Competitor scans are asked in the language of the market being measured, and tracker prompts are your own words, but no country or locale targeting of engine answers is documented.

> In the language of the market being measured: a scan of the Dutch market asks in Dutch.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/competitors · Common questions, 'In which language are the questions asked?'

**How often it checks** · Yes — Cadence is chosen per tracker between daily, weekly and monthly, plus an on-demand mode where each survey after the first is an explicit call.

> At the cadence you chose: monthly, weekly or daily checks, at the day and time you started the tracker.
> — https://epovest.com/en/tools/tracking · Common questions, 'How often are the engines asked?'

**Self-serve signup** · Yes — Registration, configuration and payment are all self-service: the configurator prices the tracker live and the first check runs when you start it, with no sales step.

> No plans, no tiers: the configurator shows your total live, before anything runs. Change a dial, the total follows; nothing is debited beyond the checks that actually run.
> — https://epovest.com/en/pricing · Section 'Your configuration is your price'

## Access and integrations

**API** · Yes — A REST API v1 is included with every account at no extra cost, serving the same surface as the app in JSON under a per-key rate limit.

> The REST API v1 and the MCP server serve everything the app shows, in JSON, at 120 requests per minute per key.
> — https://epovest.com/en · Section 'Built for volume', 'API and MCP, the same keys'

**MCP server** · Yes — A hosted MCP server is published at a single address, reachable either with an API key or a one-click OAuth connector, and is included with the account.

> MCP server, endpoint: `https://mcp.epovest.com/mcp`
> — https://epovest.com/docs/api.md · Intro, list of the two integration surfaces

**BI export** · Partly — Scores, surveys and raw answers are pullable as JSON through the documented API, but the vendor names no warehouse, Looker or Power BI connector or file export.

> Both speak JSON only and share the same keys, permissions, limits and error envelopes.
> — https://epovest.com/docs/api.md · Intro, sentence following the two integration surfaces

## CitedIndex in AI answers

2 of 4 answers cite CitedIndex.

| Engine | Result | Question | Asked on | Other sources |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ChatGPT | Cites CitedIndex | Epovest alternatives | 2026-10-12 | brandfetch.com, qwairy.co, whatagraph.com, trakker.tech, rankability.com |
| Perplexity | Cites CitedIndex | Epovest alternatives | 2026-10-12 | g2.com, omr.com, epovest.com, sourceforge.net, softwaresuggest.com |
| Claude | Does not cite CitedIndex | Epovest alternatives | 2026-09-04 | epovest.com |
| Gemini | Does not cite CitedIndex | Epovest alternatives | 2026-09-04 | g2.com, sourceforge.net, slashdot.org, pharmeasy.in, healthline.com, webmd.com |

## What changed

- 2026-09-23 — Capabilities · Free tier
- 2026-09-02 — Capabilities · Free tier · Price

## Corrections

If you represent Epovest, or anything here is wrong or out of date, send a correction with a source. The operations this site accepts from an agent are listed at https://citedindex.com/.well-known/agents.json — that catalog needs no key to read, and each entry states its own auth.