# Rankshift vs Rank Prompt

> Source: https://citedindex.com/compare/rankprompt-vs-rankshift (structured, researched, re-verified)

Rankshift and Rank Prompt are both AI-visibility trackers that launched into a crowded field, but the first thing a buyer notices is how each prices access. Rank Prompt's Starter plan costs $49/month ($39.17/month billed annually) and includes 150 monthly credits shared across prompt scans (1 credit each), AI-written articles (10 credits) and Lighthouse-style audits (5-10 credits) — a reviewer notes that scanning just 10 prompts a day burns roughly 300 credits a month, already double the Starter allotment. Rankshift's Starter plan costs more to start, $82/month, but grants 150 prompts per day (up to 9,500 monthly credits) from a pool not shared with article or audit generation — a materially larger raw prompt-tracking volume at the entry tier, for a higher entry price.

Engine coverage splits differently than a simple more-versus-fewer count suggests. Rankshift tracks nine engines — ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Mistral and Meta AI — the broadest list in this index. Rank Prompt tracks six: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Claude, Gemini and Grok. The lists aren't a subset of each other: Rank Prompt is the one that names Grok, which Rankshift doesn't track at all, while Rankshift adds Copilot, Mistral and Meta AI that Rank Prompt doesn't cover.

Both list MCP access on their pricing pages, but document it differently. Rank Prompt runs a dedicated, OAuth-secured hosted MCP server, with its own docs page, that lets Claude Code, Cursor or any MCP client read an account's visibility reports and citations and trigger new scans — one URL, browser sign-in, no API key to copy or rotate. Rankshift bundles "MCP & API access" as a feature line on every self-serve tier without a dedicated MCP integration page, but pairs it with Agent Analytics, a feature Rank Prompt doesn't offer: it logs real AI-crawler bot traffic against your own site — bot name, page path, HTTP status — evidence a pure prompt-sampling tracker can't show.

Both are young companies with thin independent review coverage — neither has the multi-year track record of a Peec AI or a Profound. Rank Prompt launched publicly in June 2025, built by a four-person team of former marketing-agency operators based in Miami; it carries just 2 published reviews on G2 (4.3/5 average), a volume G2 itself flags as too thin for a confident buying decision. Rankshift, registered as Rankshift BV in Deerlijk, Belgium, has no reviews yet on Slashdot or SourceForge at all, and independent reviewers note its bundled Content Brief Generator and AI Content Writer are newer and rougher than its tracking core — the same "young vendor, tracking core more mature than the content add-ons" pattern shows up on both tools.

| Fact | Rank Prompt | Rankshift |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What it is | Miami-founded AI-visibility tracker covering 6 AI engines from $49/month, with a hosted MCP server for querying visibility data straight from Claude Code or Cursor. | 9-engine AI visibility tracking, paired with real AI-crawler log evidence. |
| Pricing | $49 / month ($39.17/mo billed annually) | $82 / month |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Tags | Perplexity · API · Brand monitoring · Gemini · Free trial · AI Overviews · For agencies · Content optimization · Claude · ChatGPT | Perplexity · API · Brand monitoring · Gemini · Free trial · AI Overviews · Content optimization · Claude · Copilot · ChatGPT |
| Full facts | https://citedindex.com/rankprompt.md | https://citedindex.com/rankshift.md |

## Verdict

Want the lower entry price and a documented, OAuth-secured MCP server built specifically for querying visibility data from Claude Code or Cursor → Rank Prompt. Want the broadest engine coverage in this index (nine engines, including Mistral and Meta AI), a bigger raw daily prompt allotment, and AI-crawler log verification, and are comfortable paying more to start → Rankshift.

## FAQ

**What's the main difference between Rankshift and Rank Prompt?**

Rank Prompt is the cheaper entry ($49/month) with a dedicated hosted MCP server for Claude Code and Cursor. Rankshift costs more to start ($82/month) but tracks nine AI engines instead of six and adds Agent Analytics, real AI-crawler log evidence neither tool's prompt-sampling scores alone can show.

**Which is cheaper?**

Rank Prompt's Starter plan is cheaper at $49/month versus Rankshift's $82/month. But Rank Prompt's 150 monthly credits are shared across prompt scans, AI-written articles and audits — a reviewer notes 10 prompts a day alone can burn roughly 300 credits a month, double the Starter allotment — while Rankshift's 150 prompts PER DAY come from a pool not shared with article or audit generation.

**Which tracks more AI engines?**

Rankshift tracks nine — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Mistral and Meta AI. Rank Prompt tracks six: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Claude, Gemini and Grok. Rank Prompt is the only one of the two that tracks Grok.

**Do both connect to Claude Code or Cursor?**

Rank Prompt runs a dedicated, OAuth-secured hosted MCP server (with its own documentation page) built specifically so Claude Code, Cursor or any MCP client can read visibility reports and trigger new scans. Rankshift lists "MCP & API access" as a feature on every self-serve tier but doesn't document a dedicated coding-assistant integration the same way.

**Which has more of an independent track record?**

Neither, yet — both are young vendors. Rank Prompt launched publicly in June 2025 and has just 2 published reviews on G2 (4.3/5), a volume G2 itself flags as too thin for a confident buying decision. Rankshift has no reviews at all yet on Slashdot or SourceForge.