# Otterly AI vs Peec AI

> Source: https://citedindex.com/compare/otterly-ai-vs-peec-ai (structured, researched, re-verified)

Otterly AI and Peec AI both measure how AI answer engines mention your brand, but they serve different phases of a team's AI-visibility journey.

Otterly is the accessible entry point: self-serve plans starting at $29/month (Lite, 15 prompts), $189 (Standard, 100 prompts), $489 (Premium, 400 prompts) plus a custom Enterprise plan, with annual discounts. It tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot by default; Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude cost extra as add-ons. Monitoring volume (how many prompts, how often) is the main pricing lever between tiers; API and MCP access are included from Standard upward, but not on Lite.

Peec is positioned for mid-market teams and agencies, with published tiers from €85/month (Starter, 50 prompts) to €425/month (Advanced, 350 prompts) plus a custom Enterprise plan. In exchange for the higher price, you get a wider 6-engine pool to pick 3 from per project, per-engine breakdowns that go deeper, a citation-source view that directly informs GEO strategy (the sources already cited are where to earn mentions), and multi-brand workspaces built for running several clients side by side, a feature Otterly does not emphasize. Peec's own API access is reserved for its custom Enterprise plan, same as Otterly gates API/MCP behind Standard and up.

The honest trade-off: Otterly is perfect for a team just getting started with AI visibility and trying to justify the spend. Peec is what you move to when you are ready to do the research deeper: per-engine strategy, source-level targeting, and managing multiple brands at once.

| Fact | OtterlyAI | Peec AI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What it is | AI search visibility monitoring across seven engines, with citation tracking and GEO content audits. | Tracks brand visibility, position and sentiment in AI answers, with source, competitor and crawler reporting. |
| Pricing | from $29/month | from €85/month |
| API | Yes — A documented REST API with API-key auth exists, but it starts on the Standard plan and is capped at 2,000 requests a month there. | Yes — A documented REST API exists but is beta and Enterprise-only, and the plan table marks API access absent on Starter, Pro and Advanced while the homepage advertises the API with no such condition. |
| Tags | AI Overviews · API · Brand monitoring · ChatGPT · Copilot · Free trial · Perplexity | For agencies · AI Overviews · Brand monitoring · ChatGPT · Copilot · Free trial · Gemini · Perplexity |
| Best for | Marketing, SEO and content teams taking their first serious measurement of AI-search visibility, who want a self-serve start rather than a sales call. | mid-market marketing teams and agencies running AI-visibility programs |
| Full facts | https://citedindex.com/otterly-ai.md | https://citedindex.com/peec-ai.md |

## Verdict: OtterlyAI or Peec AI?

Solo founders or startups watching only ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews → Otterly. Mid-market teams or agencies needing deeper analytics and multi-client workspaces → Peec. The threshold is usually not budget but whether anyone owns the output: Otterly answers whether you are mentioned, Peec answers what to do about it, and the second is only worth paying for when someone has time to act on it.

## FAQ

**Which is cheapest?**

Otterly. Entry is $29/month (Lite) versus Peec's €85/month (Starter), both with annual discounts.

**Which covers more AI engines?**

Peec has the wider pool: 6 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, Gemini), pick 3 per project. Otterly tracks 4 by default (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Copilot); AI Mode, Gemini and Claude cost extra as add-ons.

**Does either have an API?**

Otterly includes API/MCP access from its Standard tier ($189/mo) up, but not on Lite. Peec reserves API access for its custom Enterprise plan; none of its self-serve tiers (Starter/Pro/Advanced) include it.

**Which shows which sources engines cite?**

Peec emphasizes this as a core feature (the citation-source view becomes a GEO target list). Otterly focuses on brand mentions and share-of-voice.

**Which is better for agencies?**

Peec has multi-brand workspaces purpose-built for agencies; Otterly is built more for in-house teams.

**When would a team move from Otterly to Peec?**

Once monitoring across Otterly's 4 default engines (or its paid add-ons) is not enough, or when source-level analysis and multi-brand management become needed, typically as AI visibility becomes a real business lever.